The Bronfman Enigma

There have been lots of conversations among Seagram alumni since it was announced on Friday that Edgar Bronfman Jr. was convicted of insider trading in a French court.

The news reports I read raised a number of questions. According to Crain’s NY Business, “The conviction came even though the prosecutor had recommended acquittal…” That’s curious.

The report went on to say that “the prosecutor felt the executives did not have enough information themselves about the company’s health.” What? Are we talking Edgar Jr. here? Didn’t have enough information after having bet the heritage and fortune on a guy who referred to himself as Master of the Universe?

I wonder what the judge heard and saw that the prosecutor missed.

Edgar Jr. sometimes referred to the ease and depth with which people in Hollywood were capable of lying. He described studio executives as people who can swear on their mother’s life that it is raining outside when you and they know it’s a beautiful sunny day. Yet, he couldn’t wait to do business there.

Every year since the 1950’s, Seagram ran the Seagram Family Association (SFA) meeting, an annual session for senior managers and distributor principals. At what turned out to be the last SFA, while it wasn’t known at the time, the deal to sell the company was in the works. Rumors were widespread and felt to have more than the ring of truth. Every conversation, among distributors and management alike, dealt with the speculation. Junior was at the event but hardly visible. Stayed in his suite the entire time, and based on subsequent events, was probably cutting the deals.

He showed up at the last session where customarily the owner addressed the distributors to remind them that Seagram was a family in both the literal and figurative sense of the word and to provide remarks on the state of the business and the future.

When he walked into the back of the room, he stopped and asked what we thought he should touch on in his remarks. What was the tempo, what were the top issues, what’s on their minds?

The answer was candid. “What’s on everyone’s mind is — are we going to be sold?” “The concerns are palpable…they, we, all want to know what’s going on.”

He just looked at us and went on the stage. Immediately, he began to address the topic of a sale in no uncertain terms. He said emphatically and repeatedly that Seagram was not for sale. He didn’t say this — but it was almost as though he swore on his grandfather that would not happen. Less than a month later the announcement of a sale was made.

It was a sunny, beautiful day in southern California but inside the meeting room the rain was pouring down.

In a previous blog on the Bronfman’s I wrote about pity or scorn. This is another occasion for pity. Junior orchestrated the end of his family’s spirits and wine business in favor of the idea of integrating media, entertainment, information and communications in one hand held device. The Smartphone. The idea he had was ahead of its time and with the wrong people.

Quel dommage.

Leave A Comment

Absolut Truth

This is the time of year when we used to meet with distributor management to discuss the previous year and how we looked over the holidays. It reminded me of a story about a candid assessment of a new vodka product from V&S (Absolut owners at the time) called Sundsvall.

Let me set the stage for you.

In the late 90’s it was clear that high end, connoisseur and, for some, “badge” vodka products were on the ascendency. From a day-to-day marketing and sales standpoint, it was also clear that Absolut was becoming a middle brand, flanked by the top shelf entries above and the value priced vodkas below.

We requested, pleaded and ultimately begged our Swedish partner to supply a brand that would compete with Ketel and Grey Goose. Unfortunately, the gentleman who ran the brand at V&S was totally disinterested. His intractable position was that Absolut was the best and to have a more expensive and presumably higher quality entry would belie their proposition.

No amount of cajoling could change his mind. We tried to explain that the analogy was in the scotch market — single malts are not better than blended scotches, they’re different. He ignored his own people, those of us in the trenches and even the owner.

Finally, out of the blue, we were informed that a top shelf vodka brand would soon be available. I suspect that the owner went to the top of the V&S feeding chain or, for all I know, the King of Sweden to get it done. We didn’t care so long as we had a viable brand.

Ah, viable, what a good word. Like the cliché, it’s in the eye of the beholder.

The good news was that the proposition made good sense and was indeed viable including differences from Absolut in ingredients and distillation process. The up charge of $3 to $4 higher than the other super premiums was well justified in terms of the resulting taste and initial reactions.

There were two main problems. First, V&S wanted no association between Sundsvall and Absolut, even going so far as to bypass Absolut’s longtime agency (TBWA) in favor of an agency in Boston. There was no reference to Absolut anywhere in the marketing material. No opportunity for synergy or leverage.

The bigger problem was that the package did not live up to the super premium expectation or price point. It was, at best, blah. I couldn’t find a photo on the Internet so you’ll have to take my word for it. But I remember research that indicated that servers and distributors liked the taste but felt the packaging “too plain” and “too discreet vs. competition.” Someone described it as “a clear barrel with an orange shrink wrapped top.” Those are the most positive things we heard.

No surprise that after a strong initial push the brand just languished.

The scene now shifts to the Seagram Advisory Council at some offsite location and serious winter watering hole. Don’t be fooled, the invitees were the best and brightest distributor management people in the business. While the afternoon and evenings were fun, the 5 or 6 hour work sessions were grueling. This was an occasion where the supplier was on the chopping block and got to hear about strengths and weaknesses versus competition. No BS, no holds barred, all straightforward and candid remarks.

Occasionally, there would be moments of reticence where the distributors kind of hemmed and hawed, not wanting to offend. That’s what happened when the subject of Sundsvall came up. Lots of looking at the floor.

I knew why but needed my management to hear the problems first hand from our customers who obviously didn’t want to offend or appear negative.

Question after question was lobbed and the answers were platitudes and fluff. Finally, I pushed and said, “Why is Sundsvall doing so poorly?”

One very senior manager from a very large wholesaler operation had the courage to call it like it was. He told the Absolut Truth and said, “Arthur … it’s simple —  the baby is ugly.”

A few months later the brand was gone. What a relief.

To this day I believe that the V&S senior manager who never wanted an up market brand in the first place, did all he could to sabotage the effort. It wasn’t the only mistake he made.

Leave A Comment

How old is alcohol?

A few items in the news caught my eye recently.

In the January 11 issue of Mark Brown’s Industry News Update there is a reprint of a WSJ article titled, Perhaps a Red, 4100 B.C. Here’s the story lead:

Scientists have discovered the world’s oldest known winery, secreted amid dozens of prehistoric graves in a cavern in Armenia…

Outside a mountain village still known for its wine-making skill, archaeologists unearthed a large vat set in a platform for treading grapes, along with the well-preserved remains of crushed grapes, seeds and vine leaves, dating to about 6,100 years ago—a thousand years older than other comparable finds.

The article ends by providing a “prehistory” of wine and indicates archaeologists have found traces of a fermented rice wine from a village in northern China dating back 9,000 years. Wow — alcohol use goes back 9,000 years!

But wait, there is more.

Last month the newsletter reprinted an article from the LA Times called Prohibition, online. The opening paragraph:

In most states, ordering a gun online is perfectly legal. As is ordering pornography, cigarettes and ammunition. A bottle of merlot, though, could land you in jail.

So, tell me, where do Neanderthals come from? 

Leave A Comment